In re the Exxon Valdez v. Hazelwood
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
270 F.3d 1215 (2001)
Relevant factsFree
After the Exxon Valdez, captained by Joseph Hazelwood (defendant) and owned by Exxon (defendant), ran aground and spilled massive quantities of oil into Prince William Sound, commercial fishermen, natives, and landowners (plaintiffs) won a jury verdict for damages, including purely economic harm; the district court had granted summary judgment against claimants whose injuries were purely economic under the traditional Robins Dry Dock rule, and both sides appealed.
IssueFree
In admiralty cases, may plaintiffs recover for purely economic harm if allowed by state law?
Related cases
Jackson v. General Motors Corp.60 S.W.3d 800 (2001)Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. Garris532 U.S. 811 (2001)Cunningham v. Shelton Security Service, Inc.46 S.W.3d 131 (2001)D'Amario v. Ford Motor Co.806 So.2d 424 (2001)Campbell v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Co.239 F.3d 179 (2d Cir. 2001)