Lawwly

In re the Exxon Valdez v. Hazelwood

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

270 F.3d 1215 (2001)

Relevant factsFree

After the Exxon Valdez, captained by Joseph Hazelwood (defendant) and owned by Exxon (defendant), ran aground and spilled massive quantities of oil into Prince William Sound, commercial fishermen, natives, and landowners (plaintiffs) won a jury verdict for damages, including purely economic harm; the district court had granted summary judgment against claimants whose injuries were purely economic under the traditional Robins Dry Dock rule, and both sides appealed.

IssueFree

In admiralty cases, may plaintiffs recover for purely economic harm if allowed by state law?

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases