Lawwly

In re Shell Oil Refinery

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

132 F.R.D. 437 (E.D. La. 1990)

Relevant factsFree

After a catalytic cracking unit explosion at Shell's refinery, plaintiffs sued and sought to depose Shell's in-house employees R.E. Nordstrom and Paul Nelson, who had conducted post-explosion tests specifically to assist Shell in the litigation; the plaintiffs claimed it would cost up to $300,000 for their own experts to conduct comparable tests, arguing this expense justified compelling discovery from Shell's employees.

IssueFree

Whether the rule limiting discovery of non-testifying experts retained or specially employed in anticipation of litigation to exceptional circumstances applies to a party's own in-house employees performing that same function.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases