In re Pierce Subdivision Application
Supreme Court of Vermont
184 Vt. 365 (2008)
Relevant factsFree
A neighbor appealed a planning commission's approval of a proposed planned residential development (PRD), arguing the applicant's plans didn't establish compliance with the zoning bylaws' PRD definition, that density was miscalculated, that the bylaws delegated standardless discretion to the commission, and that the PRD failed minimum-lot-size requirements. The environmental court rejected all of the neighbor's arguments, and the neighbor appealed further.
IssueFree
Whether zoning bylaws providing guidance for the density, allowed uses, height, spacing, privacy, acreage, sanitation, and modification rules for planned residential developments are improperly vague.