In re Chicago Flood Litigation
Illinois Supreme Court
680 N.E.2d 265 (1997)
Relevant factsFree
When a downtown Chicago freight tunnel flooded, property owners and businesses connected to the tunnel (plaintiffs) sued the City of Chicago (defendant) for physical property damage, lost revenues, lost wages, and lost inventory. The trial court allowed recovery for physical property damage, including perishable inventory spoiled during the resulting power outage, but barred recovery for purely economic losses under the economic-loss rule; the court of appeals affirmed, and both sides appealed.
IssueFree
Whether a plaintiff may generally recover in tort for purely economic loss.
Related cases
Lincoln General Insurance Company v. Detroit Diesel Corporation293 S.W.3d 487 (2009)Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of Alton354 S.W.3d 407 (2011)Grams v. Milk Products, Inc.699 N.W.2d 167 (2005)Casa Clara Condominium Association, Inc. v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc.620 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 1993)People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.495 A.2d 107 (1985)