Lawwly

Horne v. Aune

Washington Court of Appeals

121 P.3d 1227 (2005)

Relevant factsFree

Horne (plaintiff) and Aune (defendant), experienced real estate investors, jointly bought a house as tenants in common under a partnership agreement addressing what would happen if either was removed by law enforcement or a restraining order; after an altercation, Aune left following Horne obtaining a restraining order against him, and Horne sued to dissolve the partnership and requested to buy out Aune's interest rather than force a public sale. The trial court found the partnership agreement valid, valued the $335,000 house against its $235,000 mortgage, and ordered Horne to buy Aune's interest for $50,000; Aune argued the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) required a public sale instead, and both parties cross-appealed.

IssueFree

Whether the Revised Uniform Partnership Act requires a public sale of partnership property as the only permissible means of liquidating partnership assets during winding up.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases