Lawwly

Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project

Supreme Court

130 S.Ct. 2705 (2010)

Relevant factsFree

The Humanitarian Law Project and other plaintiffs wanted to train and assist two U.S.-designated terrorist organizations, the PKK and LTTE, in using international law to resolve disputes peacefully and in petitioning bodies like the United Nations, but a federal statute barred providing "material support" to organizations designated as engaging in terrorist activity. After the district court partially granted a preliminary injunction and the court of appeals affirmed, the government sought Supreme Court review of whether the material-support ban violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment rights.

IssueFree

Whether a federal law prohibiting the provision of material support to designated foreign terrorist organizations violates the First Amendment.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases