Lawwly

Gregory v. Cott

California Supreme Court

331 P.3d 179 (2014)

Relevant factsFree

Carolyn Gregory (plaintiff), a professional caregiver with prior experience caring for Alzheimer's patients and knowledge of their potential for violent tendencies, was injured by a knife when her patient, Lorraine Cott, became violent while Gregory was doing dishes; Gregory sued Lorraine's husband Bernard Cott and Lorraine (defendants) for negligence, the trial court granted summary judgment based on primary assumption of risk, the appellate court affirmed, and Gregory appealed.

IssueFree

Whether an employer owes a duty to protect a caregiver-employee from a patient's violent outburst where such violence is an ordinary risk inherent in caring for Alzheimer's patients.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases