Gregory v. Cott
California Supreme Court
331 P.3d 179 (2014)
Relevant factsFree
Carolyn Gregory (plaintiff), a professional caregiver with prior experience caring for Alzheimer's patients and knowledge of their potential for violent tendencies, was injured by a knife when her patient, Lorraine Cott, became violent while Gregory was doing dishes; Gregory sued Lorraine's husband Bernard Cott and Lorraine (defendants) for negligence, the trial court granted summary judgment based on primary assumption of risk, the appellate court affirmed, and Gregory appealed.
IssueFree
Whether an employer owes a duty to protect a caregiver-employee from a patient's violent outburst where such violence is an ordinary risk inherent in caring for Alzheimer's patients.
Related cases
California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Moody's Investors Service, Inc.172 Cal. Rptr. 3d 238 (2014)Palermo v. LifeLink Foundation Inc.152 So.3d 1177 (2014)Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. v. Actelion Ltd.222 Cal. App. 4th 945 (2014)Doe I v. Nestle USA, Inc.766 F.3d 1013 (2014)Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox740 F.3d 1284 (2014)