Lawwly

Gregory v. Ashcroft

Supreme Court

501 U.S. 452 (1991)

Relevant factsFree

Missouri state judges (plaintiffs), appointed by the governor and subject to retention elections, sued the state (defendant) arguing Missouri's constitutional mandatory retirement age of 70 for judges violated the ADEA's ban on mandatory retirement ages for employees over 40; the ADEA's definition of "employee" excludes elected officials, their personal staff, and appointees on the policymaking level, and the trial court and court of appeals both found judges fell outside the ADEA's employee definition, dismissing the suit.

IssueFree

Whether a federal statute like the ADEA should be construed to cover state judges as "employees," thereby overriding a state's constitutional authority to set judicial qualifications, absent an unmistakably clear statement of congressional intent to do so.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases