Granholm v. Heald
United States Supreme Court
544 U.S. 460 (2005)
Relevant factsFree
Michigan and New York each ran licensing schemes for wine producers, wholesalers, and retailers that permitted only in-state wineries to sell directly to consumers, explicitly barring out-of-state wineries from that same direct-sale channel.
IssueFree
Whether, under the Dormant Commerce Clause doctrine, states may enact legislation that improperly burdens or discriminates against interstate commerce.
Related cases
Western & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California451 U.S. 648 (1981)Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas139 S. Ct. 2449 (2019)Reeves, Inc. v. Stake447 U.S. 429 (1980)Hunt, Governor of the State of North Carolina v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commn.432 U.S. 333 (1977)South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros., Inc.303 U.S. 177 (1938)