Lawwly

Ferguson v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

298 F.3d 778 (9th Cir. 2002)

Relevant factsFree

As a condition of employment, Ferguson (plaintiff) had to sign an arbitration agreement with Countrywide (defendant) requiring arbitration for the discrimination, harassment, and tort claims employees typically bring, while exempting the intellectual-property, unfair-competition, and trade-secret claims Countrywide itself was more likely to bring. The agreement made Ferguson pay a filing fee, split arbitrator fees with Countrywide (which could run into the thousands of dollars), and limited any deposition of a Countrywide representative to four designated topics without a matching limit on employee depositions. Ferguson later sued Countrywide and her supervisor for sexual harassment and retaliation; the district court found the arbitration agreement unconscionable and denied Countrywide's motion to compel arbitration.

IssueFree

Whether an arbitration agreement must be both procedurally and substantively unconscionable to be unenforceable, and whether Countrywide's agreement met that standard.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases