Ely v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
38 F. Supp.3d 518 (2014)
Relevant factsFree
Ely and other plaintiffs sued Cabot (defendant) for property damage and injuries allegedly caused by its hydraulic fracturing operations, presenting expert testimony that a lack of care during fracking could cause water contamination, while Cabot presented reports showing fracking doesn't affect water quality when due care is exercised, along with evidence that fracking had rapidly become widely adopted and that oil-and-gas extraction generally had a century-long history in the state, and that Cabot had complied with all permitting requirements.
IssueFree
Whether hydraulic fracturing is an abnormally dangerous activity, and thus subject to strict liability.
Related cases
California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Moody's Investors Service, Inc.172 Cal. Rptr. 3d 238 (2014)Palermo v. LifeLink Foundation Inc.152 So.3d 1177 (2014)Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. v. Actelion Ltd.222 Cal. App. 4th 945 (2014)Doe I v. Nestle USA, Inc.766 F.3d 1013 (2014)Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox740 F.3d 1284 (2014)