Dapson v. Daly
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
153 N.E. 454 (1926)
Relevant factsFree
Both parties were hunting deer when the plaintiff shot and wounded one but did not capture it before the defendant separately shot and killed the same deer, then took the carcass home; the plaintiff, who lacked a valid hunting license required by state law, sued in replevin to recover the carcass, and the trial court ruled for the defendant on the ground the plaintiff had never taken actual possession sufficient to acquire title.
IssueFree
Whether a state may require a person to have a valid hunting license to hunt and take possession of a wild animal.