Cuker v. Mikalauskas
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
692 A.2d 1042 (1997)
Relevant factsFree
Minority shareholders (plaintiffs) sued PECO's (defendant's) directors and officers for alleged mismanagement, and PECO's board formed a special litigation committee of three outside, non-defendant directors, who investigated and found no bad faith, self-dealing, or breach of loyalty; the board then voted to terminate the litigation, but the lower court, finding Pennsylvania had not adopted the business judgment rule, held the corporation lacked power to terminate a pending derivative suit and denied PECO's summary judgment motion.
IssueFree
Whether a corporation's board has the power to terminate derivative suits brought by minority shareholders.
Related cases
Lang v. Star Herald107 F.3d 1308 (8th Cir. 1997)In re Figter Limited118 F.3d 365 (1997)First Securities Company v. Dahl560 N.W.2d 327 (1997)Klehr v. A.O. Smith Corp.521 U.S. 179 (1997)New York University Medical Center and Association of Staff Psychiatrists, Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital324 N.L.R.B. No. 139 (1997)