Connick v. Myers
United States Supreme Court
461 U.S. 138 (1983)
Relevant factsFree
After Sheila Myers (plaintiff), an assistant district attorney, opposed a transfer within Harry Connick's (defendant) office, she circulated a questionnaire to coworkers touching on the transfer policy, office morale, a grievance committee, confidence in supervisors, and political-campaign pressure; Connick fired her for insubordination and disruption, and Myers sued claiming First Amendment retaliation. The district court and court of appeals ruled for Myers relying on Pickering v. Board of Education.
IssueFree
Whether a public employee's speech on a matter unrelated to the public concern is protected by the First Amendment from regulation by his or her government employer.
Related cases
Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.459 U.S. 400 (1983)Marsh v. Chambers463 U.S. 783 (1983)Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue460 U.S. 575 (1983)North Dakota v. United States460 U.S. 300 (1983)Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission461 U.S. 190 (1983)