Lawwly

Colorado River Indian Tribes v. National Indian Gaming Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

466 F.3d 134 (2006)

Relevant factsFree

The IGRA created the National Indian Gaming Commission (defendant) with joint regulatory and audit authority over class II gaming (like bingo), while leaving class III gaming (slots, roulette, blackjack) to be governed by tribal-state compact under state-law standards; the Colorado River Indian Tribes (plaintiff) conducted class III gaming under a compact with Arizona. When the Commission later promulgated internal-control standards for both class II and class III gaming and sought to audit the Tribe's class III operations for compliance, the Tribe objected and sued, and the district court held the Commission lacked authority to audit or regulate class III gaming.

IssueFree

Whether, under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, class III gaming is regulated by tribal-state compact rather than the National Indian Gaming Commission.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases