Clark v. Kmart Corp.
Supreme Court of Michigan
634 N.W.2d 347 (2001)
Relevant factsFree
Annie Clark (plaintiff) slipped on grapes on the floor of a Kmart (defendant) store and was injured. She could not directly prove how long the grapes had been on the floor or that a Kmart employee actually knew about them, but she offered circumstantial evidence — including the condition and location of the grapes — suggesting the store should have discovered and cleaned up the hazard through reasonable inspection. The lower courts had to decide whether this circumstantial showing was enough to survive summary judgment.
IssueFree
Whether circumstantial evidence of a defendant's negligence may be sufficient for a plaintiff in a slip-and-fall case to survive a motion for summary judgment.
Related cases
Jackson v. General Motors Corp.60 S.W.3d 800 (2001)Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. Garris532 U.S. 811 (2001)Cunningham v. Shelton Security Service, Inc.46 S.W.3d 131 (2001)D'Amario v. Ford Motor Co.806 So.2d 424 (2001)Campbell v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Co.239 F.3d 179 (2d Cir. 2001)