City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
United States Supreme Court
531 U.S. 32 (2000)
Relevant factsFree
Indianapolis set up vehicle checkpoints using standardized, discretion-limited procedures to interdict illegal drugs, stopping 1,161 vehicles and making 104 arrests, roughly half drug-related, over several months in 1998. Edmond and Palmer (plaintiffs), stopped at such a checkpoint, brought a class action claiming the roadblocks violated the Fourth Amendment; the court of appeals agreed, and the city sought Supreme Court review.
IssueFree
Whether a suspicionless roadside checkpoint established for the purpose of deterring general criminal activity is unlawful under the Fourth Amendment.