Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Woods
United States Supreme Court
480 U.S. 1 (1987)
Relevant factsFree
Woods (plaintiffs) won a $300,000 jury verdict against Burlington Northern Railroad Co. (Burlington) (defendant) in a personal-injury suit removed to Alabama federal court on diversity grounds. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed and, applying an Alabama affirmance-penalty statute designed to deter frivolous appeals, added a 10 percent penalty. Burlington argued this conflicted with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38, which lets a court of appeals award damages and costs for a frivolous appeal, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.
IssueFree
Whether a state procedural rule may be applied in a federal diversity suit when it conflicts with a federal procedural rule serving the same asserted purpose.