Lawwly

Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Woods

United States Supreme Court

480 U.S. 1 (1987)

Relevant factsFree

Woods (plaintiffs) won a $300,000 jury verdict against Burlington Northern Railroad Co. (Burlington) (defendant) in a personal-injury suit removed to Alabama federal court on diversity grounds. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed and, applying an Alabama affirmance-penalty statute designed to deter frivolous appeals, added a 10 percent penalty. Burlington argued this conflicted with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38, which lets a court of appeals award damages and costs for a frivolous appeal, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

IssueFree

Whether a state procedural rule may be applied in a federal diversity suit when it conflicts with a federal procedural rule serving the same asserted purpose.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases