Lawwly

Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.

California Supreme Court

248 P.3d 1185 (2011)

Relevant factsFree

Bruns (plaintiff) sued E-Commerce Exchange (defendant) in 2002; over the following years, the trial court issued both orders staying the entire litigation and separate orders staying only parts of it, like discovery. In 2006, E-Commerce moved to dismiss under a statute requiring trial within five years of filing, and the trial court granted dismissal; the Court of Appeal reversed, reasoning that partial-stay periods should also be excluded from the five-year calculation under the statute's stay exception, which would mean the deadline hadn't yet passed.

IssueFree

Whether the statutory exclusion from the five-year trial deadline for periods when the action was "stayed" includes partial stays affecting only some case proceedings, or only stays of the entire action.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases