Lawwly

Boykin v. Alabama

United States Supreme Court

395 U.S. 238 (1969)

Relevant factsFree

Boykin (defendant), indicted for a string of armed robberies, pleaded guilty to all charges at arraignment. The judge asked him no questions about the plea, and Boykin made no statements on the record about whether he understood what he was giving up.

IssueFree

Whether a guilty plea is constitutionally valid when the record contains no indication that the plea was made knowingly and voluntarily.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases