Lawwly

Board of Education of Minneapolis v. Hughes

Minnesota Supreme Court

136 N.W. 1095 (1912)

Relevant factsFree

Hughes (defendant) bought a lot from Hoerger in 1906, receiving a deed with the grantee's name left blank; he later filled in his own name and recorded the deed in December 1910. Hoerger had also given a quitclaim deed for the same lot to Duryea & Wilson in 1909, which was recorded a few days after Hughes's deed; Duryea & Wilson had in turn conveyed the property to the Board of Education (plaintiff) by warranty deed recorded even earlier, in January 1910 — but at that point nothing in the public record yet showed Duryea & Wilson had valid title to convey. The Board sued to establish its ownership, and the trial court ruled for the Board. Hughes appealed.

IssueFree

Whether delivering a deed with the grantee's name left blank, on the understanding it will later be filled in, can constitute valid delivery of title, and whether a subsequent purchaser who records first takes valid title over an earlier grantee who failed to record in time.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases