
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion
United States Supreme Court
563 U.S. 333 (2011)
Relevant factsFree
Vincent and Liza Concepcion (plaintiffs) sued AT&T Mobility, LLC (AT&T) (defendant) as part of a putative class action over sales-tax charges on advertised free phones. Their service agreement required individual arbitration and barred class arbitration. Relying on the California Supreme Court's Discover Bank rule, which deemed class-arbitration waivers in certain consumer adhesion contracts unconscionable, the district court denied AT&T's motion to compel individual arbitration, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
IssueFree
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts any state law that conflicts with it.
Related cases
Shady Grove Orthopedic Assoc. v. Allstate Ins. Co.559 U.S. 393 (2010)Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.552 U.S. 576 (2008)Rent-A-Center v. Jackson130 S. Ct. 2772 (2010)Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.559 U.S. 662 (2010)Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson539 U.S. 1 (2003)