Anderson v. City of Issaquah
Court of Appeals of Washington
851 P.2d 744 (1993)
Relevant factsFree
Anderson's (plaintiff) development plans for property in Issaquah (defendant) were repeatedly denied by the city's development commission for vague aesthetic reasons, after being given suggestions for a resubmission that was also denied; Anderson sued, arguing the city's building design guidelines were unconstitutionally vague.
IssueFree
Whether a land use statute's design considerations may contain provisions allowing for review based on subjective standards.
Related cases
County of Dane v. Norman497 N.W.2d 714 (1993)Holscher v. James860 P.2d 646 (1993)Maplewood Bank & Trust v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.625 A.2d 537 (1993)Atlantic Richfield Co. v. The Long Trusts860 S.W.2d 439 (Tex. App. 1993)Citizens Bank & Trust v. Brothers Construction & Manufacturing, Inc.859 P.2d 394 (1993)