Almond v. Unified School District #501
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
665 F.3d 1174 (10th Cir. 2011)
Relevant factsFree
In 2003, Almond's (plaintiff) school district employer (defendant) told him it would demote and reduce his pay, delaying the actual reduction by written agreement for two years; Almond didn't file an administrative age-discrimination charge until 2006, and argued the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act's paycheck-reset rule for unequal-pay claims should extend to reset his limitations period each time he received a reduced paycheck.
IssueFree
Whether, under the ADEA, the limitations period for filing an administrative charge begins to run when an employee knows or should have known of the adverse employment decision.
Related cases
In re The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Shareholder Litigation2011 WL 4826104 (Del. Ch. Oct. 2011)In re Puff2011 WL 2604759Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.131 S.Ct. 2179 (2011)In re WL Homes, LLC452 B.R. 138 (2011)Federal National Mortgage Association v. Olympia Mortgage Corporation792 F. Supp. 2d 645 (2011)