Almond v. Unified School District #501
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
665 F.3d 1174 (10th Cir. 2011)
Relevant factsFree
In 2003, Almond's (plaintiff) school district employer (defendant) told him it would demote and reduce his pay, delaying the actual reduction by written agreement for two years; Almond didn't file an administrative age-discrimination charge until 2006, and argued the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act's paycheck-reset rule for unequal-pay claims should extend to reset his limitations period each time he received a reduced paycheck.
IssueFree
Whether, under the ADEA, the limitations period for filing an administrative charge begins to run when an employee knows or should have known of the adverse employment decision.
Related cases
Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins507 U.S. 604 (1993)Community Counselling Service, Inc. v. Reilly313 F.2d 239 (1963)Bostock v. Clayton CountyNo. 17-1618 (June 15, 2020)Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.731 F.3d 1106 (2013)Minor v. Centocor, Inc.457 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 2006)