Lawwly

Alderman v. United States

United States Supreme Court

394 U.S. 165 (1969)

Relevant factsFree

Alderman and other defendants were prosecuted using wiretap evidence, and the government conceded one instance of wiretapping was illegal; the defendants argued this illegally obtained evidence should be excluded from their trials regardless of whose Fourth Amendment rights the wiretap actually violated.

IssueFree

Whether a criminal defendant has standing to demand exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of another person's constitutional rights.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases