Lawwly

Yick Wo v. Hopkins

United States Supreme Court

118 U.S. 356 (1886)

Relevant factsFree

San Francisco required laundry operators in wooden buildings to obtain a permit to continue operating, though most of the city's laundries were made of wood. Yick Wo and Wo Lee (defendants), Chinese laundry operators, along with over 200 other Chinese-descent operators, sought permits; all but one were denied. Meanwhile, 80 of 81 similarly situated non-Chinese operators received permits. Yick Wo and Wo Lee were fined and imprisoned for operating without permits, and their state-court and federal habeas challenges both failed before reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.

IssueFree

Whether a facially neutral law that is applied in a discriminatory manner on the basis of race or nationality violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases