Lawwly

Westpac Pacific Food v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

457 F.3d 970 (2006)

Relevant factsFree

Westpac (plaintiff), a grocery-store purchasing syndicate, received roughly $5 million annually in cash advances from suppliers as volume-purchase discounts, which Westpac kept if it purchased the agreed inventory volume at full price but had to repay, prorated, if it purchased less; Westpac, an accrual-basis taxpayer, booked the advances as a liability and offset it as purchases occurred. The Commissioner (defendant) sought to tax the advances as income in the year received; the Tax Court agreed with the Commissioner, and Westpac appealed.

IssueFree

Whether, for federal tax purposes, a cash advance contingent on the recipient's future performance is taxable as income at the time it is received.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases