Lawwly

Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust

United States Supreme Court

487 U.S. 977 (1988)

Relevant factsFree

Watson (plaintiff), a Black bank employee, was repeatedly passed over for supervisory promotions in favor of white candidates, with the bank's (defendant) supervisors making promotion decisions based entirely on their own subjective judgment rather than any formal or standardized criteria; Watson sued alleging the bank's informal, discretionary promotion practice produced a disparate racial impact violating Title VII, and the lower courts rejected her claim, apparently reasoning disparate-impact analysis did not extend to subjective decisionmaking.

IssueFree

Whether disparate-impact analysis may be applied under Title VII where an employer uses subjective rather than standardized criteria to make employment decisions.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.