Lawwly

Vance v. Ball State University

United States Supreme Court

133 S. Ct. 2434 (2013)

Relevant factsFree

Vance (plaintiff), a Black catering assistant at Ball State University (BSU) (defendant), alleged ongoing harassment by Davis, a higher-ranking catering specialist who directed some of Vance's work but had no power to hire, fire, promote, or discipline her; Vance sued BSU, arguing it was vicariously liable for Davis's harassment as her supervisor. The district court and Seventh Circuit found BSU not vicariously liable because Davis lacked authority to take tangible employment actions against Vance, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

IssueFree

Whether an employee is a supervisor for purposes of vicarious liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 if he or she is not empowered by the employer to take tangible employment actions against the victim.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.