Lawwly

Van Gundy v. Van Gundy

Colorado Court of Appeals

292 P.3d 1201 (2012)

Relevant factsFree

Eldon (plaintiff), as trust beneficiary, created an irrevocable trust naming his son Quinton (defendant) trustee, with a provision expressly authorizing investments regardless of fiduciary-law permissibility or diversification; Quinton invested trust assets in stocks, mutual funds, a Venezuelan gold-mining company (Crystallex), and margin purchases, and when the assets' value plummeted and Eldon ordered liquidation, a $340,000 loss resulted. Eldon sued for breach of contract, fiduciary duty, and accounting; the trial court held Quinton liable for both the margin purchases/diversification failure and the Crystallex investment, and Quinton appealed the margin and diversification rulings.

IssueFree

Whether a trustee may be held liable for violating the prudent investor rule if (1) investments conformed to a trust provision expressly permitting conduct contrary to the rule and (2) the trustee's conduct otherwise complied with the parties' intent.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.