Lawwly

U.S. v. Sarihifard

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

155 F.3d 301 (1998)

Relevant factsFree

Federal agents questioned Mohammad Sarihifard (defendant) about a car sale connected to a suspected money-laundering operation run by his friend and employer; Sarihifard lied, and the agents told him they knew he was lying. A prosecutor aware of that lie nonetheless convened a grand jury, warned Sarihifard of his Fifth Amendment rights, and put him on the stand, where he repeated the same lie under oath, leading to his perjury prosecution and conviction; Sarihifard appealed, raising perjury entrapment as a defense.

IssueFree

Whether perjury entrapment consists of coaxing a witness into giving false testimony for the sole purpose of charging the witness with perjury.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.