Lawwly

United States v. Klein

United States Supreme Court

80 U.S. 128 (1871)

Relevant factsFree

An 1863 statute allowed people whose property was seized during the Civil War to recover it, or compensation, by proving they had not aided the Confederacy; President Lincoln separately offered a pardon to former Confederate supporters who took a loyalty oath, and the Supreme Court had held a pardon was sufficient proof of non-support. V.F. Wilson took the oath and was pardoned; after his death, Klein (defendant), his estate's administrator, sought compensation for seized property. While Klein's case was pending, Congress repealed the 1863 statute and passed a new 1870 law barring courts from treating a pardon as proof of loyalty, deeming acceptance of an unqualified pardon as conclusive proof of Confederate support instead, and stripping the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction over any case where a claimant was found to have supported the Confederacy. The government relied on this new law to challenge the property rights already granted to Klein.

IssueFree

Whether Congress may constitutionally pass legislation that specifically directs or impairs the actions of the judicial or executive branches of government.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.