Lawwly

United States v. Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

176 F.3d 719 (3d Cir. 1999)

Relevant factsFree

Julio Hernandez (defendant) was tried for hijacking a tractor-trailer. The trial judge allowed jurors to submit written questions for witnesses, with counsel given a chance to object outside the jury's presence before the judge decided whether to ask an approved question. Only one juror ever submitted a question, and the judge chose not to ask it. Hernandez was convicted and appealed, arguing the judge abused her discretion simply by permitting juror questioning at all.

IssueFree

Whether a trial judge abuses discretion by permitting jurors to submit written questions for witnesses, subject to counsel's opportunity to object and the judge's screening before any question is asked.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.