United States v. Estes
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
793 F.2d 465 (1986)
Kenneth Estes (defendant) was prosecuted for lying to a grand jury about a theft. His estranged wife, Lydia, testified before the grand jury and at trial that Kenneth had come home with a bag of money and told her he had stolen it; she then helped him count, hide, and launder the stolen cash. Kenneth objected that all of Lydia's testimony -- both about his confession and about her own later actions -- involved privileged confidential marital communications and should have been excluded. The jury convicted him, and he appealed to the Second Circuit.
Whether the rule excluding privileged marital communications from evidence is strictly construed and applied only in very limited circumstances.