United States v. American Can Co.
United States District Court for the District of Maryland
230 F. 859 (D. Md. 1916)
Relevant factsFree
American Can (defendant) systematically bought out tin can competitors at prices far exceeding market value, leveraging its association with a major tin-plate supplier to threaten reluctant competitors with being put out of business, then raised prices once it dominated the market; the United States (plaintiff) sued under the Sherman Act, and American Can argued its market strength had also produced genuine product improvements and efficiencies benefiting consumers.
IssueFree
Whether monopolization is unlawful under antitrust law even if the monopoly creates market efficiencies and product improvements that benefit consumers.