Lawwly

Swierkiewicz v. Sorema, N.A.

United States Supreme Court

534 U.S. 506 (2002)

Relevant factsFree

Swierkiewicz (plaintiff), a Hungarian national serving as Chief Underwriting Officer and senior vice president of Sorema, N.A. (defendant), a French-owned reinsurance company, had many of his responsibilities transferred to a less-experienced French national after a new French CEO took over, was eventually stripped of his CUO title, and after failing to meet with the CEO, sent a memo outlining his grievances and requesting severance to resign; instead, Sorema's counsel offered him only the choice to resign without severance or be fired, and he was terminated after declining to resign. Swierkiewicz sued for employment discrimination in federal court; the district court dismissed the complaint for failing to plead sufficient facts, and the Second Circuit affirmed based on the evidentiary framework from McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green (1973).

IssueFree

Whether a complaint in an employment discrimination case that does not plead specific facts is nonetheless sufficient to constitute a complaint in federal court.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.