Lawwly

Summit House Co. v. Gershman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

502 N.W.2d 422 (1993)

Relevant factsFree

Bruce and Karen Gershman (defendants) contracted to sell their condominium to Summit House Company (Summit) (plaintiff), and after Summit sued to terminate the contract, the district court instead awarded the Gershmans specific performance requiring Summit to pay roughly $107,000. When Summit didn't pay, the Gershmans levied execution on the contract and bought Summit's interest at a sheriff's sale for about $73,000; Summit then sought a ruling that this sale satisfied the earlier judgment in full, but the district court found Summit still owed the roughly $34,000 difference, and Summit appealed.

IssueFree

Whether an execution sale brought to enforce a money judgment against a defaulting buyer on a contract for deed cancels the underlying contract that formed the basis of that judgment.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.