Lawwly

Sullivan v. United Dealers Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

486 S.W.2d 699 (1972)

Relevant factsFree

James and Norma Sullivan (defendants) hired Memory Swift Homes (Memory Swift) to build a house and signed a promissory note secured by a mortgage, providing United Dealers Corporation (United) (plaintiff) with written statements confirming that construction work had been properly and workmanlike performed; Memory Swift then assigned the note and mortgage to United. When the Sullivans defaulted, United sued to collect and foreclose, and the Sullivans raised construction-defect claims against Memory Swift as a defense; the circuit court found United a holder in due course unaffected by those defenses and ruled for United, and the Sullivans appealed, arguing United's frequent dealings with Memory Swift and knowledge that work was unfinished at purchase put it on notice of defenses.

IssueFree

Whether a person who takes a negotiable instrument may be a holder in due course only if he lacks notice of a claim or defense to the instrument at the time of taking or negotiation.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.