Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
841 P.2d 1183 (1992)
Stringer and Schubert (plaintiffs), along with two others, owned 43 percent of Consumer Data Systems (CDS), while the remaining 32 majority shareholders -- the entire board -- owned 57 percent. The majority shareholders transferred their CDS shares into a new corporation, Car Data Systems, Inc. (defendant), which then merged with CDS over the minority's objection, offering minority shareholders just $0.002 per share, even though Stringer and Schubert claimed the shares were worth at least $0.10 and that the majority knew the offered price was unfairly low. Stringer and Schubert sued for breach of fiduciary duty rather than pursuing an appraisal remedy; the majority shareholders moved to dismiss, arguing appraisal was their sole remedy, and the trial court agreed and the appeals court affirmed.
Whether judicial appraisal is the exclusive remedy for shareholders dissenting to a merger in the absence of fraud or unlawful conduct.