Lawwly

Stephenson v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

839 F.2d 1095 (1988)

Relevant factsFree

Monroe Stephenson (plaintiff), an experienced investor, had his brokerage account at Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. (defendant) handled by employee James Welch. In October 1982, Stephenson learned of an unauthorized trade and told Welch, who promised to fix it, but Stephenson never checked whether it actually was corrected -- including ignoring a December 1982 account statement that would have revealed it wasn't. Several more unauthorized trades followed over the next months; Stephenson kept telling Welch but never informed Paine Webber itself until September 1983. Stephenson sued Paine Webber and Welch over the trades. The district court ruled for Paine Webber, and Stephenson appealed.

IssueFree

Whether an investor who learns of unauthorized trading in his account but fails to follow up with the brokerage firm has satisfied the due diligence requirement for a section 10(b) securities fraud claim.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.