Lawwly

State v. Richardson

Kansas Supreme Court

209 P.3d 696 (2009)

Relevant factsFree

Robert Richardson (defendant) knew he had been HIV-positive for over a decade and had sexual intercourse with two individuals, M.K. and E.Z., neither of whom knew of his status; he told one of them he had no sexually transmitted diseases and did not use a condom. The State of Kansas (plaintiff) charged Richardson with two counts of exposing another to a life-threatening communicable disease. He waived a jury and was tried by the judge; he admitted knowing he had HIV and having sex with both individuals but argued he did not intend to expose them, offering medical testimony on HIV transmission. The trial judge found him guilty on both counts without the State introducing the specific-intent evidence it had submitted at the preliminary hearing, and Richardson appealed.

IssueFree

Whether, to establish the crime of exposing another to a life-threatening communicable disease, the prosecution must prove the defendant specifically intended to expose the victim to the disease.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.