State v. Lauglin

Lauglin (defendant) intentionally set fire to a stable, and the fire spread to a nearby barn containing corn and peas; the barn burned but was not completely destroyed. Lauglin was indicted for feloniously, willfully, and maliciously setting fire to the barn -- a structure he had not directly targeted -- and was convicted, then appealed, arguing he couldn't be guilty of willfully burning the barn since that was never his original intent.