Lawwly

Semenetz v. Sherling & Walden, Inc.

Court of Appeals of New York

851 N.E.2d 1170 (2006)

Relevant factsFree

After young Sean Semenetz was injured by a sawmill manufactured by S&W Edger Works, Edger Works sold most of its assets to Sawmills & Edgers (defendant) under a contract expressly stating Sawmills did not assume Edger Works's liabilities, and Sawmills continued selling Edger Works's sawmill products while Edger Works itself changed its name to Sherling & Walden (also a defendant). Sean's mother Bridget Semenetz (plaintiff) sued Sawmills for products liability, and while the trial court found Sawmills liable for continuing Edger Works's product output, the appellate court reversed; Semenetz appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a corporation that purchases another corporation's assets is liable for the seller's torts if the purchaser continues the output of the seller's products.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.