Lawwly

Schweiter v. Halsey

Washington Supreme Court

359 P.2d 821 (1961)

Relevant factsFree

The Halseys (defendants) agreed to sell only the tillable portion of their farm to the Schweiters (plaintiffs), but lacking a legal description of just that portion, the parties signed an earnest-money agreement without an exact property description, which the Halseys later supplemented with a survey and legal description. When Schweiter's wife refused to sign the closing documents, the Schweiters rescinded and sued for return of their $5,000 earnest money, even though the Halseys remained ready, willing, and able to perform throughout; the trial court ordered the earnest money returned, and the Halseys appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a purchaser may recover earnest money paid under a purchase contract that is unenforceable under the statute of frauds, if the purchaser defaulted and the seller was at all times ready, willing, and able to consummate the transaction.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.