Sakansky v. Wein

Sakansky (plaintiff) owned land accessed by a deeded easement across Wein's (defendant) property at a specifically defined location. Wein wanted to build over the easement, offering only eight feet of vehicle clearance plus an alternative detour route around the new construction; Sakansky sought an injunction against the construction. The trial court, over Sakansky's objection, admitted evidence of the proposed alternative route, finding the eight-foot restriction reasonable only if paired with the new detour, but unreasonable without it, and Sakansky sought review of both the evidentiary ruling and his entitlement to an injunction.