Lawwly

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

Ninth Circuit

64 F.3d 1250 (1994)

Relevant factsFree

Several Indian tribes (plaintiffs) asked California (defendant) to negotiate placing stand-alone electronic gaming devices in reservation casinos, but California refused because the devices were illegal under state law. The tribes sued in district court under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., seeking a declaration that California was obligated to negotiate the terms of such gaming. The district court granted summary judgment for the tribes, but the Ninth Circuit reversed, holding California had no duty to negotiate over gaming illegal under state law, and denied the tribes' petition for rehearing.

IssueFree

Whether the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act requires states to negotiate with Indian tribes over gaming that is illegal under state law.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.