Richardson v. Union Carbide Industrial Gases, Inc.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
790 A.2d 962 (N.J.Super. 2002)
Hoeganaes (defendant) purchased furnace equipment from Rage using a proposal and a purchase order that each referenced separate terms and conditions containing conflicting indemnity clauses, none of which were ever actually discussed by the parties. About three years after the sale, Jerry Richardson (plaintiff), a Hoeganaes employee, was injured when the furnace exploded and sued Rage and Hoeganaes; Rage cross-claimed against Hoeganaes for indemnification. The trial court granted Hoeganaes summary judgment on the cross-claim, and Rage appealed.
Whether, when an acceptance to an offer contains terms that conflict with those in the offer, the conflicting terms become part of the contract.