Lawwly

Rhode Island v. Innis

Supreme Court

446 U.S. 291 (1980)

Relevant factsFree

Innis (defendant) was arrested for kidnapping, robbery, and murder, was read and understood his Miranda rights, and asked for a lawyer. While three officers drove him to the station, two of them talked between themselves about worrying that a child from a nearby school for the handicapped might find Innis's hidden gun and get hurt. Innis then told them to turn around so he could show them the gun's location, was re-read his rights, and led them to it. The trial judge found no Miranda violation and admitted the gun and Innis's statements; the state supreme court disagreed, and the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.

IssueFree

Whether a suspect has been "interrogated" for Miranda purposes when he is riding in a car with police officers who are talking to each other about a public-safety concern.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.