Lawwly

Reynolds v. International Amateur Athletic Federation

6th Circuit

23 F.3d 1110 (1994)

Relevant factsFree

After Reynolds (plaintiff) obtained a default judgment and a $27.3 million award against the IAAF (defendant) in Ohio federal court -- based on a finding that the IAAF's American member, the TAC, had sufficient Ohio contacts to serve as its agent -- Reynolds tried to garnish money owed to the IAAF by U.S. sponsors. The IAAF, a London-based unincorporated association of 205 national federations with no U.S. offices and no events held in Ohio, appeared to quash the garnishment and vacate the judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction; the district court denied the motion, and the IAAF appealed.

IssueFree

Whether an international entity must have minimum contacts in the forum state in order to be subject to personal jurisdiction of a U.S. court.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.