Lawwly

Rambus Inc. v. FTC

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

522 F.3d 456 (2008)

Relevant factsFree

Rambus (defendant), an active member of the standards body JEDEC until withdrawing in 1996, held patents that were later incorporated into JEDEC's SDRAM and DDR SDRAM memory standards without JEDEC ever learning of Rambus's patent interests during the standardization process; after the standards were adopted, Rambus asserted its patents to negotiate higher licensing fees, and the FTC (plaintiff) found this nondisclosure was deceptive and had enabled unlawfully higher fees, ordering Rambus to adopt reasonable royalty rates, which Rambus appealed.

IssueFree

Whether deceptive conduct by a firm with lawful monopoly power violates Sherman Act Section 2 if the conduct merely enables the firm to charge higher prices.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.